Flips tracking of IPC
mp26 at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Tue May 3 15:01:41 CEST 2005
>>I therefore do not consider it to be "dummy".
>>L4VFS is meant to be extended on a use-case basis, it has grown over the
>>last 1 1/2 years as other projects utilized it. Maybe you have to
>>extend it a little bit. We gladly accept patches (hint, hint).
> ;)... ok i've understood the hint.
> but the dummy i've talked about was the implementation of
> that is the implementation of the dielibc...
This has *nothing* to do with the dietlibc!
> bue when it calls the
> server side function it's not implemented.
Your are quite unprecise with your statements. Which fcntl do you mean?
Are you talking about l4vfs/lib/server/fcntl.c? This is the weak
implementation of the server lib. Every server which implements fcntl()
functionality shall provide its own impl. overriding this weak dummy impl.
I think you now know were to start coding ...
> my question was if in one of those projects someone implemented it
I dont know of any such thing.
More information about the l4-hackers