Fwd: attempted fix for asm in oskit cpuid.c
spoooq at gmail.com
Wed Apr 12 00:14:08 CEST 2006
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: spooq <spoooq at gmail.com>
Date: Apr 11, 2006 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: attempted fix for asm in oskit cpuid.c
To: Ronald Aigner <ra3 at os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
I see dietlibc's printf is not given a good review on
On 4/11/06, spooq <spoooq at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'll start using one of those. Is there any real difference between the two?
> Id also like to know what would need to be done to port L4Env to a new
> arm-based arch, eg video card driver (not supported by existing linux
> driver), touchscreen, mmu. Is there a list somewhere of interfaces
> that need to be implemented?
> btw, just spooq is fine
> On 4/11/06, Ronald Aigner <ra3 at os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > Hello spoo(o)q,
> > spooq wrote on 10.04.2006 19:36 this:
> > > I tried to fix some errors in cpuid.c ... wouldnt rely on it, my asms
> > > not very good and I havent tested it beyond seeing that it compiles.
> > > Basically it just makes the asm respect gcc using the ebx as a pic
> > > reg. Not sure about the \n\t stuff, it made it work tho.
> > Nice job. However, oskit is no longer supported as a libc for L4Env
> > applications. Please use either dietlibc or uclibc.
> > Thanks, keep it up.
> > Ron.
> > - --
> > Mit freundlichen Gruessen / with regards
> > ra3 @ inf.tu-dresden.de
> > http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~ra3/
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v126.96.36.199 (GNU/Linux)
> > iD8DBQFEPCGivCdOf9l7ipgRAv9RAKCEMCFLEx1o0ehBLG+f5J+6I9/dIgCgwjdV
> > SzC8KfKBWcPvexF8A8vzadw=
> > =1wJw
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the l4-hackers