con-ux bug?

Frank Mehnert fm3 at
Fri May 12 16:00:58 CEST 2006

On Friday 12 May 2006 15:48, Wei Shen wrote:
> > That does not make much sense. Are you sure that you disassembled the
> > same binary which caused the general protection? I assume not.
> Sorry! You are right, and I made a silly mistake.
> It is an "int 0x80" instruction in lx_kill() in
> "lxfuxlibc/lib/src/lxfuxlc.c".
> But I still think I am right at that the original cause. The backtrace is:

Excuse me, did you try adding -n7 as I suggested?

## Dept. of Computer Science, Dresden University of Technology, Germany ##
##                                     ##
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the l4-hackers mailing list