Fwd: attempted fix for asm in oskit cpuid.c

[spooq]

I think this list needs to be fixing its reply-tos... I wasnt the only
one caught by it...

On 4/12/06, Steffen Liebergeld <s1010824 at inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:14:08 +0100, spooq <spoooq at gmail.com> said:
> > *sigh* ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: spooq
> > <spoooq at gmail.com> Date: Apr 11, 2006 11:12 PM Subject: Re:
> > attempted fix for asm in oskit cpuid.c To: Ronald Aigner
> > <ra3 at os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
>
>
> > I see dietlibc's printf is not given a good review on
> > http://www.and.org/vstr/printf_comparison...
>
> That comparison is very old, and they tested version 0.22 of
> dietlibc. The current version is 0.29 (have a look at
> http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/).
>
> --
> Microsoft is simply one example of a proprietary software developer, a
> software developer that tries to subjugate users to keep them divided
> and helpless. -- Richard M. Stallman
>