clarification on explicit preemption points in Fiasco IPC

Adam Lackorzynski adam at
Tue Jun 26 13:59:46 CEST 2007

On Fri Jun 22, 2007 at 09:37:21 +0200, Sergio Ruocco wrote:
> Alexander Warg wrote:
> >In particular, the Fiasco IPC path for register only IPC runs with
> >disabled interrupts and has explicit preemption points.
> Then everything else in Fiasco runs with interrupts enabled and it is
> preemptable. Is this correct ? Are there notable exceptions ?


Adam                 adam at

More information about the l4-hackers mailing list