L4 on ARM: cache coherency and virtual address space

Adam Lackorzynski adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Wed May 11 16:30:03 CEST 2011


Hi,

On Tue May 10, 2011 at 21:11:21 +0200, Michal Schulz wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Adam Lackorzynski
> <adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> 
> >> 1. Since ARM machine I use does not provide cache snooping, i.e. I
> >> have to flush/invalidate the caches manually, I've attempted to use
> >> the l4_cache_dma_coherent function. It did worked to some degree, but
> >> it flushed/invalidated only *some* lines of cache within requested
> >> region, instead of *all* lines of cache. Since I've failed to trace
> >> the bug, I've extended sigma0 with new functionality - ability to map
> >> uncached memory. I still don't like my hack though and I would like to
> >> find an official way to either change the attributes (from cached to
> >> uncached) of given page, or have fully working l4_cache_dma_coherent.
> >
> > 'io' has the feature to get uncached memory, defining a resource
> > Mmio_ram(size_in_bytes, 1_for_superpages_0_otherwise) in the
> > configuration. That's the official way of getting uncached memory.
> 
> The solution you gave is not working, since moe allocated all
> available RAM already before io even started. Log says:
> 
> MOE: Hello world
> MOE: found 502196 KByte free memory
> MOE: found RAM from 90000000 to af000000
> [...]
> IO      | WARNING: phys mmio resource allocation failed
> IO      | IOMEM   [000000903b3000-000000903b3fff 1000] non-pref
> (32bit) (align=fff flags=c002)

The error message is misleading (sorry) and hasn't anything to do with
the memory allocation itself.

For the cache, does it work when you use l4_cache_dma_coherent_full()?
Which core are you using?



Adam
-- 
Adam                 adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
  Lackorzynski         http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/




More information about the l4-hackers mailing list