adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Wed Jul 11 16:39:19 CEST 2012
On Wed Jul 11, 2012 at 17:19:20 +0400, Valery V. Sedletski wrote:
> ----- Исходное сообщение -----
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Valery V. Sedletski
> > <_valerius at mail.ru>wrote:
> > > Robert Campbell wrote:
> > So is this incorrect or just dated?
> > http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pipermail/l4-hackers/2010/004454.html
> Yes, it seems to be incorrect, so must to be in reverse order, as Mag
> is more minimalistic, and is a Nitpicker clone, whereas Dope has more
> features. (just wait what Adam will say)
Both statements are not wrong as there are touching different things.
Indeed DOpE has a widget facility which mag does not have.
On the other side mag offers a windowing interface which DOpE does not
offer as DOpE would be on the client side of that interface.
The reason for having both mag and DOpE (and l4con) is that I like to
have multiple implementors of the same interface around. In this case
all (mag via its plugin) offer the L4Re::Console interface where a
client does not need to care who actually implements that. So the
server-side can be exchanged without the client noticing.
Adam adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
More information about the l4-hackers