adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Fri Sep 6 00:23:47 CEST 2013
On Thu Sep 05, 2013 at 15:51:20 +0200, Daniel Müller wrote:
> I am wondering is there any particular reason why Cap::move() uses
> L4_FPAGE_RWX instead of a mask of all bits?
> l4_task_map(L4_BASE_TASK_CAP, L4_BASE_TASK_CAP,
> Shouldn't L4_FPAGE_RWX be replaced with L4_CAP_FPAGE_RWSD in order
> to not restrict rights artificially?
> I am seeing subtle differences in application behavior in a scenario
> of mine...
Yes, makes sense.
Adam adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
More information about the l4-hackers