BSP support - UART
ba_f at rbg.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
Wed Oct 14 00:39:29 CEST 2015
I have a custom board with Zynq processor.
Unfortunately, it uses UART0 which produces only garbage.
(A lot of white spaces or tabs and single freak characters, if this is
My ZedBoard uses UART1 and Fiasco runs successfully on it.
I'm sure Zynq is proper configured on the new board, because the U-Boot
output is displayed correctly.
But the Fiasco output then looks like a wrong baud-rate, or something.
With both boards i open console with:
picocom /dev/ttyACM0 -b 115200
As far as i can see, Zynq TRM doesn't specify any difference between
UART0 & UART1, beside the addresses.
But, this one is set right in Fiasco.
OnetSwitch use UART0, and its U-Boot works great.
At least i don't see any difference between ZedBoard U-Boot and
Onetswitch U-Boot, except for the Uart address.
More information about the l4-hackers