*sigh*
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: spooq spoooq@gmail.com Date: Apr 11, 2006 11:12 PM Subject: Re: attempted fix for asm in oskit cpuid.c To: Ronald Aigner ra3@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
I see dietlibc's printf is not given a good review on http://www.and.org/vstr/printf_comparison...
On 4/11/06, spooq spoooq@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I'll start using one of those. Is there any real difference between the two?
Id also like to know what would need to be done to port L4Env to a new arm-based arch, eg video card driver (not supported by existing linux driver), touchscreen, mmu. Is there a list somewhere of interfaces that need to be implemented?
btw, just spooq is fine
-- spooq
On 4/11/06, Ronald Aigner ra3@os.inf.tu-dresden.de wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello spoo(o)q,
spooq wrote on 10.04.2006 19:36 this:
I tried to fix some errors in cpuid.c ... wouldnt rely on it, my asms not very good and I havent tested it beyond seeing that it compiles. Basically it just makes the asm respect gcc using the ebx as a pic reg. Not sure about the \n\t stuff, it made it work tho.
Nice job. However, oskit is no longer supported as a libc for L4Env applications. Please use either dietlibc or uclibc.
Thanks, keep it up. Ron.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / with regards ra3 @ inf.tu-dresden.de http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~ra3/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEPCGivCdOf9l7ipgRAv9RAKCEMCFLEx1o0ehBLG+f5J+6I9/dIgCgwjdV SzC8KfKBWcPvexF8A8vzadw= =1wJw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----