On Thu Nov 29, 2012 at 20:27:09 +0800, OSDepend wrote:
Yes, that's the current workflow. Usually we use for example Qemu to launch and run systems on our laptops. Physical systems are usually booted via network.
Indeed, there's no ready-to-use solution for that.
Thank you for your answers, it was very helpful. Now I have some more questions:
I wanna to port some app on L4Re, like bash, sphinx. The only thing I can use is the C/C++ library you provide, so it seems like that i need to rebuild every library and dll for the current apps. Do you have some advices or guidlines for me?
I do not understand what you mean with rebuilding every library for an application. Do you mean those available on L4Re already or new ones?
Hi Chen, I guess you want to compare the performance of L4Linux with non-L4Linux. It could be a little faster! But you have to > > write an OS layer and maintain it if any changes from your upper java framework. josh zhao
Yes, I think the L4Linux may reduce the performance. If I write an OS layer for my ported application, the layer may also interfer the performance of pure Microkernel. That's why I want build/port my application directly on L4Re!
Actually it's an quite easy choice. L4Linux is an OS layer but not your choice for your target application. So you need a different one that better fits your target application, such as scalability. That can maybe be L4Re, maybe it's L4Re + some additions, maybe something different. Possibilities exist.
Adam