>To add to what Björn already mentioned: You are free to use whatever you
>like but for that you need to have an understanding on the options. L4Re
>is an offer that significantly reduces complexity for developing native
>L4 applications. For example, look at l4/pkg/hello/server/src/main.c,
>the "Hello World" greeting. This is a native L4 application, you do not
>need Linux to run it. However, L4Re, among many more things, makes it
>possible that this program is so common to you and you immediately
>understand what it is doing. But if you like you can also work directly
>on the kernel's interfaces only. However, then you are likely starting
>to develop an operating system layer before starting your application.
>Adam
Thank you for your help. What i really care about is how well the L4Re
is providing. Because i have a willing to port a search engine or a hadoop
framework on L4Re to see if i can gain much more performance benifit.
In L4Re, you have already present uclibc and pthread for programmer.
But it seems like that I need to build the application (hello
world) with the L4Re, and after that i can boot the system and
run the app.
Can i just build and run my applications on L4Re after the
L4Re+Fiasco.OS has been boot? Is there any tools developed to dynamic build
and load applications? (i'm not refereing to the Ned which inits and loads
compiled apps.)