-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sean schrieb:
Dear
We are currently working on the ukernel design and survey the L4 API interface. For Fiasco, it is implemented on L4/V2 and L4/X.0 interfaces.
That's only partially true for the latest Fiasco SVN version. We consider it implementing the L4.Fiasco spec, implementing L4v2 and several additions that have been inherited from other specs such as x0 or have been incorporated by ourselves.
If we implement a new u-kernel by ourselves that follows the same L4 API interface, will it still support the L4Env and L4Linux which will be put above this u-kernel? I think this issue is reasonable.
Since it is an ABI, not an API, when you implement a kernel providing the same ABI provided by Fiasco, you will be able to run L4Env and L4Linux on top, yes. Bjoern - -- Dipl.-Inf. Bjoern Doebel Mail: doebel@tudos.org TU Dresden, OS Chair Phone: +49 351 463 38 799 Noethnitzer Str. 46 Fax: +49 351 463 38 284 01187 Dresden, Germany WWW: http://www.tudos.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIuRV6P5ijxgQLUNkRAhJvAJ0WUlEDwAbdvmV6HP40EF2OIfTIdACffs7v LiOFYAGCTzW7BoMmZI0Lz3k= =wSa+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----