First, I'd like to note that my domain apparently been compromised and Jean's server bounces it, which makes replying a little more difficult than it could be.
In previous email Jean suggested to check string to ensure that I have correct kernel version. Which I will do once I get around to it. To be honest this raises a question. If I in fact have wrong kernel version, could I get that particular one? I also think that for tests to make sense I'd need compiler version and arguments passed to it. I don't think that explanation on purpose of that is needed.
Also, please be advised that I am not yet ready to run benchmarks and it may take *more* than a day or so before I will be ready. Not because, I am missing software, but rather because mach has paging issue and need to set everything up and recompile with compatible options.
Well obvious solution to Mach's problems is critical path optimizations.
wow, /me wonders why no-one ever thought about that...
Fact that people thought about it, does not mean that it has been done and/or ineffective.
Well, I was talking about "First class flexpage-based address spaces" paper presented in by Shapiro in(around) 2000.
(Unfortunatly I was only able to browse the text version provided by google since the Server providing the post script version is down)
I am attaching paper to the message. Don't know if mailing list server will not strip it.
Sincerely, IS.