1. Is it possible to compile any of these tools for x86_64? Xavian-Anderson Macpherson Shingoshi --
On Thu Apr 02, 2009 at 18:45:46 -0700, Xavian-Anderson Macpherson wrote:
1. Is it possible to compile any of these tools for x86_64?
Yes. Adam -- Adam adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/
On Fri Apr 03, 2009 at 11:45:20 -0700, Xavian-Anderson Macpherson wrote:
Adam, Thanks! But maybe I should have been more specific. I meant using x86_64 as the target. But I'm thinking that would still be your answer. So, now I'll ask this: 1. After booting my machine with a Fiasco kernel, what exactly will I be able to do with it?
Nothing. The kernel 'does no real work', really. Everything is done by programs on top.
2. How many of the drivers will depend on Linux for their operation (if any)?
Mostly only those that are in Linux but the question is a bit blur. If the driver is independant of Linux it does not need it.
3. Can the Linux toolchain of binutils, gcc, glibc be compiled using the DICE development tools?
No. Dice is for L4 code only.
4. Ultimately, how likely is it that I would be able to build a Slackware distribution on Fiasco?
Unlikely, except you have quite a lot of time to spent. Adam -- Adam adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de Lackorzynski http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~adam/
participants (2)
-
Adam Lackorzynski -
Xavian-Anderson Macpherson