TCB size in ix86 L4
Torsten Paul
paul at os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Fri Jan 8 18:23:40 CET 1999
Michael Hohmuth <hohmuth at innocent.com> writes:
> can't meet real-time requirements; the task_delete operation seems to
> be especially bad, sometimes disabling interrupts for more than one
> second.
>
Yes, the measurements showed interrupt a latency of sometimes 1.5
seconds (even if the interrupt thread had the highest priority) when
in the L4-Linux System had to serve a lot of calls to fork/exec. This
was tested with the lat_proc benchmark from the lmbench-suite that
tries to measure the latency for creating simple processes (that only
call exit)
Still there is only one explanation for this: disabled interrupts
while flushing the complete address space of a task when doing
task_delete.
ciao,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Paul Es ist leichter, einen Atomkern zu
paul at os.inf.tu-dresden.de // spalten als ein Vorurteil.
__________________________ooO_(+ +)_Ooo________Albert Einstein_(1879-1955)
U
More information about the l4-hackers
mailing list