Questions about Fiasco.OC scheduler and L4Linux
Marc CHALAND
l4 at marc-chaland.net
Fri Mar 24 22:48:03 CET 2017
Hi,
2017-03-22 23:45 GMT+01:00 Adam Lackorzynski <adam at os.inf.tu-dresden.de>:
>
> Basically the vCPU model is an asynchronous execution model, that is
> very similar to an actual CPU. I.e. you have vCPU that executes code and
> that has an entry vector that is being jumped to whenever the vCPU shall
> get an event (both asynchronous interrupts and synchronous exceptions).
> To prevent diverting to the entry code there's a virtual interrupt flag,
> i.e. if virtual interrupts are off, no message/interrupt will be posted.
> Based on that multi-threading in the vCPU is implemented, i.e. some
> timer triggers an interrupts, which in turn triggers some scheduling
> code running in the vCPU which in turn does some stack switching.
> You can also look into this paper
> http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/papers_ps/rtlws2010_genericvirt.pdf
So, in that case, I have to implement my own scheduler to run it into one
vCPU ? We don't have the code of the old scheduler.
> I'm sure you've heard e.g. about Intel VT, or ARM's Virtualization
> Extensions. Those are CPU features that basically allow you to
> efficiently(!) execute OS kernels deprivileged, by providing another
> layer of address translation and proper CPU exception handling. OSs
> need to integrate those mechanism to run unmodified guest kernels.
> In L4Re this is also mapped to a vCPU which however has more state.
> The virtual platform is provided by a VMM component.
>
OK, I will have a look at that. Thank you for your answers.
Regards
Marc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pipermail/l4-hackers/attachments/20170324/eda0c9d7/attachment.htm>
More information about the l4-hackers
mailing list